The template for the base pages categorizes them automatically. That page was in the the Other category because its name was unspecified. However, since the page also had no image or much other info, I deleted it.
Hey King Dragonhoff, I wanna know how u get the positions above? Because other people seem to be inactive and I have plenty of time coz I'm stuck at home due 2 coronavirus. Of course, I'll also have free time later, but I just wanna ask? ~Eddiedbspd
I had a badge to earn and it says that to earn it u have to add an article to a category. I mistakenly added Rocket Launcher to the Buildings category and now I can't undo it! Sorry and how can I make this up???
Those patch notes state that the 130k collection cap was removed. This does not mean the boats will hold unlimited resources. Collection from the boat was simply previously capped to the max capacity of a single max-level Sawmill/Quarry/Mine. The boat would still be limited by how much the resource bases behind them can hold, which is more that 130k if you have enough resource bases, but not unlimited. This lines up with the information already on the page.
it isnt though, i know it from practice. there is no cap of any kind. it sounds to me like you just dont want it to be true, and i assure you it is. what proof do you want? screencaps of a boat being emptied? the page is wrong, i am right.
I am just going on what I have seen from Supercell and their update notes. Nothing that they have put out suggests that the boat has unlimited capacity, and the logic of the game suggests the same: giving the boat unlimited capacity would not make much sense. I am more inclined to believe what I have seen myself and that the info in question has not been disputed by anyone else in all the years that it has been on this wiki. I am fine with being proven wrong, but you will need to present something to prove your claim in order to do that.
so, if max collector holds 130k, and 14 max bases hold 1,820,000 by what you say. here is a screencap of more. its not an easy shot to get. i am not trying to scam you! i just want what you want, the page to be right.
in addition, 1.82m assumes 14 max mines, which nobody has. most have some old level 3, 7, 12, whatever bases kicking around. you can fill your resources to full, and what you cant fit, will stay on the boat, just like i said in the edit. when hq23 hit, i filled my res to max 4 times with the res boat, did hq, armory, and 2 landing crafts.
Alright, I stand corrected. It seems something has changed. However, I would still hesitate to call it "unlimited." Everything in the game has a limit, even if that limit is very high or unclear, whether it's for balance or simply down to limits of the game's technology. Feel free put your edits back, but be sure to reword them to indicate that the limit is very high while not using the word "unlimited."
i do not understand your crusade of systematically reverting every edit i make, all of them are good information, applicable to gameplay, and previously omitted from the page. did i wrong you in a past life or something?
I do not revert edits because of who makes them. I revert edits when they are a poor fit for the page. I was not targeting you as you suggest. In this case, I had reason to believe that the information that you were adding was incorrect, but as I said, I see that an update has changed things. The pages are updated now.
kd, if i can find the info, can we make a "speed up" column for everything? i.e. the gem cost with full resources, as opposed to instant.
edit: the best i could find led right back here, to the cost of time calculator. i am willing to put in the time though, if you add a "speed up" column to everything. i dont know how to modify a chart, and even if i did, i wouldnt put in all that work without an ok first 😬
Resource boats have always had a capacity, and as far as I know, that is still true. Saying that it's "just a fact" without any evidence or source does not give me any confidence in what you are saying. You will need to present some proof.
Greetings, King Dragonhoff. I realized back in June (2nd or 3rd) that as the leader of our task force had inadvertantly posted a 2nd thread in the Task Force Recruitment board, you or one of the other admins had taken it down. I know but also re-read the rules and do not have a problem with that action; even if it was a mistake, it still is unfair spamming.
I then started a new recruitment thread on June 7th and double checked that there was no duplicate. You then promptly deleted it the following morning: not sure why? So before I start another thread, I figured I should check with you. Thank you!